20 Questions HR Should Be Asking
Maximizing Your Impact

Have you ever played “20 Questions”? The objective is to ask a maximum of 20 questions that would enable you to guess the secret topic that another player has written down. The more strategic the questions, the fewer need to be asked. It’s a great way to pass the time on long car rides. The right questions can also help you a great deal in business.
In recent years, Human Resources professionals have increasingly focused on becoming more purposeful and strategic in their contribution to the success of their employers. While a great amount of progress has been made, there is still an opportunity to improve. In order to move forward, it's important to understand the real interplay between HR and the revenue generating or cost control functions of a business.
Every company and industry has its own nuances, but below is a starting list of twenty questions that I believe should serve as the basis for developing an impactful HR strategy that helps move business performance forward.
Business Overview
- What are the core revenue streams of the company? How do we make money and what factors directly help or hinder our ability to do so?
- How is the annual financial performance of the company measured? (Revenue, EBITDA, EFO, etc.)
- What are the connection points between the HR function and the company’s P&L?
- What are the business strategies or practices that most directly influence performance and how are they impacted by market conditions?
- How well are the functional leaders aligned and able to execute on the short- and long-term business strategies? Where is additional coaching or support necessary?
- What is the current state of the company as it relates to diversity and inclusion and how does this compare against established goals and objectives?
- What is the current condition of the operating or commercial groups (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, etc.)?
- Are there major structural or operationally strategic changes anticipated within the next six to twelve months? Within the next three to five years?
- Where is the greatest financial risk currently?
- How is accountability defined and driven through the organization?
Human Resources
- In what ways is HR serving the organization and what more does the business need in order to succeed? Are these strategic or transactional / administrative?
- What are the metrics that define the current status and end state of the HR function? Are they process or results measures?
- Are all weekly transactional practices (payroll, recruiting, benefits administration, etc.) operating smoothly?
- What changes are anticipated within the next one to two years that require a new talent skill set?
- When was the last functional audit of HR practices last conducted? Are there any compliance issues that need to be addressed?
- What is the current budgeted headcount for each role / unit / function? Are changes required in order to execute on the business strategy?
- What is the current voluntary and/or involuntary annual turnover rate? Are particular groups higher than others? Why?
- Has the top performing 20% of employees been identified and are plans in place to ensure their retention?
- How is employee engagement currently measured and what strategies are in place to drive it? Is the existing culture truly performance- based?
- What protocols have been created to ensure work continuity during the pandemic? What steps are we taking to ensure a safe return for employees when it becomes appropriate?
Ideally, the answers to these questions will help you to better understand the core of the business and its high level HR needs. If you need assistance with your HR practices, call HR Strategies Now.
December 2, 2021

From Theory to Execution - Building a Culture That Demands Leadership If leadership excellence isn’t about knowledge, then what is it about? It’s about building an environment where leadership is required, visible, and unavoidable. Most organizations never get there. Here’s how the ones that do think differently. Step 1: Define Leadership in Behavioral Terms “Be a better leader” is meaningless. Instead, define leadership like this: “Addresses performance issues within 48 hours” “Delegates decisions with clear ownership and authority” “Drives clarity by aligning team priorities weekly” If you can’t see it, you can’t manage it. Step 2: Make Leadership Measurable What gets measured gets managed. Ask: Are decisions being pushed down or pulled up? Are leaders developing successors or creating dependency? Is accountability consistent across teams? Are new ideas being generated? If leadership isn’t measured, it becomes subjective - and subjective standards don’t scale. Step 3: Align Consequences with Expectations This is where most organizations fail. They say leadership matters, but they tolerate: avoidance of difficult conversations inconsistent accountability leaders who produce results but damage culture siloed and self-optimizing behavior You can’t have leadership excellence without consequences for non-leadership behavior . Step 4: Build Leadership into the Operating System Leadership isn’t a program. It’s how the business runs. It shows up in: how meetings are conducted how decisions are made how performance is reviewed how feedback is delivered If leadership only shows up in training sessions, it won’t stick. Step 5: Create Cultural Pressure for Leadership The strongest cultures don’t rely on top-down enforcement. They create peer-level expectations. Leaders hold each other accountable, teams expect clarity and ownership, and underperformance is addressed quickly and directly Leadership becomes the norm, rather than the exception. The Payoff When leadership becomes part of the system, execution speeds up, decision-making improves, teams take ownership, and senior leaders get out of the weeds. And the organization finally operates at the level its strategy demands. Final Thought Most companies are trying to teach leadership. The best companies build environments where leadership is the only way to succeed . That’s the shift. And once it happens, everything else gets easier.

Let’s address the uncomfortable truth: Most leaders already know what they should be doing. They just don’t do it consistently. Not because they’re incapable - but because something is working against them. What’s Really Holding Leaders Back? It’s not a lack of awareness. It’s a combination of three forces that quietly shape behavior: 1. Success Has Trained Them to Stay the Same Leaders are promoted because they deliver results. So they double down on what got them there: solving problems themselves moving quickly by making decisions solo stepping in when things go sideways The problem? Those behaviors don’t scale. But letting go of them feels risky. So they don’t. 2. Short-Term Pressure Overrides Long-Term Discipline In theory, leaders know they should: coach instead of direct develop instead of fix empower instead of control But in reality? Deadlines hit. Clients escalate. Revenue matters. So they revert to speed and control because it’s faster right now. And just like that, long-term leadership development loses to short-term execution pressure. 3. The Organization Quietly Rewards the Wrong Behavior Watch closely and you’ll see it - the leader who “jumps in and saves the day” gets praised. Or the leader who builds a self-sufficient team gets overlooked. Or perhaps the leader who avoids conflict keeps the peace and avoids backlash. Organizations say they want leadership excellence. But their reward systems often reinforce the opposite. Why This Matters More Than You Think When leaders don’t change: their teams don’t grow decision-making stays centralized innovation slows burnout increases at the top And eventually, the business hits a ceiling that no strategy can fix. The Real Work of Leadership Development If you want leaders to change, you have to change the environment around them. That means: redefining what “good leadership” looks like aligning incentives with the behaviors you want creating consequences for avoiding leadership responsibilities Because people don’t rise to expectations. They rise to what the system reinforces .



