Third Chances

Addressing Repeated Issues

Four employees at a workstation, one checking his watch

How do you know when to draw the line with an employee? Especially when it’s one of your best performers. Imagine that your business depends on a core group of employees to perform well day in and day out. You’ve noticed one employee who performs extremely well technically but you’ve noticed that over the last two months he’s been repeatedly late or absent for his shift. As a matter of fact, you review his attendance and find that he’s been late by more than 10 minutes on nine occasions. You’ve asked him about the issue before but the only response that he gives you is that traffic is bad. 

 

On the other hand, you have another employee who has been with your team longer but struggles technically and requires a great deal of support. He’s just called in for the fourth time in the last two weeks saying that he’s going to be more than 30 minutes late. There’s no valid excuse offered. He’s just going to be late. It’s evident that this employee is not helping your cause. You’re tired of feeling that your employees are taking advantage of you and decide he will serve as a great example when he’s fired after he arrives. 

 

Texas is an “Employment at Will” state so it should be just as easy as making the decision and delivering the news, right? Well, maybe. You have a basic attendance policy somewhere in one of the binders on your bookshelf but there’s been no communication to employees. The importance of getting to work on time should simply be “common sense”, right?

 

Realistically, it’s not that simple. You can be terminated in an “employment at will” state for just about any reason… or no reason. But an employer is at risk of a “wrongful termination” if there are other issues at play such as written or implied promises of continued employment, evidence of misleading or lying to the employee, discrimination, retaliation and the like. If the employee makes such a claim, the burden of proof then falls to the employer to show that the action was appropriate. 

 

In this particular case, there are at least two known risks. First, there’s no evidence that you’ve shared the attendance policy with the employees and second, you’re being inconsistent in how the policy is administered. If the fired employee challenged the issue, you would first need to be prepared to defend your actions. And in that case, communication of policy and consistency in how that policy is administered is going to be your best approach. 

 

Let’s say for a moment that the terminated employee claimed that they were let go because of discriminatory practices as they are minority or over 40 years old. You are then on the hook for somehow demonstrating that the decision was based solely on the attendance issue. How do you do that if you have no documentation to support it? 

 

This is the reason that it is so important to follow a couple of basic HR practices. First, ensure that you provide each of your employees with an employment handbook that captures and explains at least the most basic expectations such as attendance, prevention of drug and alcohol use, safety, etc. Have the employee sign a confirmation page indicating that they have received it. 

 

Second, ensure that you’re following effective performance management practices.  At a higher level, performance management is about ensuring that there is a plan on how business is to be performed. But in this case, it’s an incremental approach to correct a performance or behavior-based problem. It often starts with a basic verbal warning, then progresses to a written counseling notice, a written warning, perhaps a final written warning and then termination. The key message in each of these steps is that you are trying to bring the issue to the employee’s attention and the desire is to return them to good standing. 

 

An effective performance management process will help you in several ways: It will provide structure so employees know what to expect, it serves as a solid communication tool ensuring that expectations are conveyed and it provides the best chance of turning the situation around before it reaches the termination stage. If you are ever challenged on a termination, you will want to be able to demonstrate that the decision was appropriate based on the policy violation and that you are consistent in how you administer that policy. Otherwise you run the risk of having to pay back and future wages as well as court costs and attorney’s fees. 

 

Remember, your communication to an employee that there is a problem is the first step in getting it corrected.  And consistency in how you address issues is your best bet in making sure that you avoid a compliance problem. 

Brian Wallace • January 10, 2023
By Brian Wallace April 29, 2026
From Theory to Execution - Building a Culture That Demands Leadership If leadership excellence isn’t about knowledge, then what is it about? It’s about building an environment where leadership is required, visible, and unavoidable. Most organizations never get there. Here’s how the ones that do think differently. Step 1: Define Leadership in Behavioral Terms “Be a better leader” is meaningless. Instead, define leadership like this: “Addresses performance issues within 48 hours” “Delegates decisions with clear ownership and authority” “Drives clarity by aligning team priorities weekly” If you can’t see it, you can’t manage it. Step 2: Make Leadership Measurable What gets measured gets managed. Ask: Are decisions being pushed down or pulled up? Are leaders developing successors or creating dependency? Is accountability consistent across teams? Are new ideas being generated? If leadership isn’t measured, it becomes subjective - and subjective standards don’t scale. Step 3: Align Consequences with Expectations This is where most organizations fail. They say leadership matters, but they tolerate: avoidance of difficult conversations inconsistent accountability leaders who produce results but damage culture siloed and self-optimizing behavior You can’t have leadership excellence without consequences for non-leadership behavior . Step 4: Build Leadership into the Operating System Leadership isn’t a program. It’s how the business runs. It shows up in: how meetings are conducted how decisions are made how performance is reviewed how feedback is delivered If leadership only shows up in training sessions, it won’t stick. Step 5: Create Cultural Pressure for Leadership The strongest cultures don’t rely on top-down enforcement. They create peer-level expectations. Leaders hold each other accountable, teams expect clarity and ownership, and underperformance is addressed quickly and directly Leadership becomes the norm, rather than the exception. The Payoff When leadership becomes part of the system, execution speeds up, decision-making improves, teams take ownership, and senior leaders get out of the weeds. And the organization finally operates at the level its strategy demands. Final Thought Most companies are trying to teach leadership. The best companies build environments where leadership is the only way to succeed . That’s the shift. And once it happens, everything else gets easier.
By Brian Wallace April 29, 2026
Let’s address the uncomfortable truth: Most leaders already know what they should be doing. They just don’t do it consistently. Not because they’re incapable - but because something is working against them. What’s Really Holding Leaders Back? It’s not a lack of awareness. It’s a combination of three forces that quietly shape behavior: 1. Success Has Trained Them to Stay the Same Leaders are promoted because they deliver results. So they double down on what got them there: solving problems themselves moving quickly by making decisions solo stepping in when things go sideways The problem? Those behaviors don’t scale. But letting go of them feels risky. So they don’t. 2. Short-Term Pressure Overrides Long-Term Discipline In theory, leaders know they should: coach instead of direct develop instead of fix empower instead of control But in reality? Deadlines hit. Clients escalate. Revenue matters. So they revert to speed and control because it’s faster right now. And just like that, long-term leadership development loses to short-term execution pressure. 3. The Organization Quietly Rewards the Wrong Behavior Watch closely and you’ll see it - the leader who “jumps in and saves the day” gets praised. Or the leader who builds a self-sufficient team gets overlooked. Or perhaps the leader who avoids conflict keeps the peace and avoids backlash. Organizations say they want leadership excellence. But their reward systems often reinforce the opposite. Why This Matters More Than You Think When leaders don’t change: their teams don’t grow decision-making stays centralized innovation slows burnout increases at the top And eventually, the business hits a ceiling that no strategy can fix. The Real Work of Leadership Development If you want leaders to change, you have to change the environment around them. That means: redefining what “good leadership” looks like aligning incentives with the behaviors you want creating consequences for avoiding leadership responsibilities Because people don’t rise to expectations. They rise to what the system reinforces .
Executive team sitting around a conference table.
By Brian Wallace April 29, 2026
Most companies don’t lack leadership knowledge—they lack execution. Discover why leadership fails and what it takes to turn insight into results.